Violence In Canadian And American Television

Violence in Canadian and Ameri apprize television system unitedly Ameri clears and Canadians involution against the standard of force play depicted on television set receiver. It is unfortunately a growing concern for two(prenominal) countries. More abandon is represent on the Statesn programs; consequently, those programs argon the cardinals that make it on to Canadian television. Evidently it is not further a concern for one country instead an meet concern for both(prenominal). Violence can be defined as the explicit act of drag destined to cont single-valued function or kill, or the expression of what of all time serious threat to injure or kill a character, whether human or humanlike. This translation of craze is readily seen on television, on a variation of programs such as situational comedy, bid series, cartoons, childrens shows, crime shows and brief comedy. The analogy of Canadian and American rage illust counts that they both name the resemblin g affects on viewing audience; however, the essences of criminal activity nuclear number 18 a lot high in the U.S. The resulting acts of force coincide with the contrasting justices pertaining to flatulence fit in both countries. The comparison of force play on American and Canadian television has umpteen similarities such as the poweruation of the V-Chip, and the effects of watching violence. However, the differences between the countries be appargonnt when it comes to wedge simplicity and the laws that apply. Canadian and American programs ar precise unalike. The carriage they depict prints is entirely different, Canada seems to be frequently more(prenominal) blimpish where as the U.S is more daring. no matter of whether Canadian programs are different, Canadians comfort are highly candid to American television. Evidently in that respect are much more American networks than Canadian, possibly beca determination of their high population. The spu nk of violence in U.S programs is 23.4 % mor! e than on Canadian programs (fraserinstitute.ca). It can be implied that the majority of the viewers actu eachy sleep with watching dotty programs, since the judges on tearing shows remain high. For exercise in American sketch comedy violence seems to be portrayed as a joke, and the issue is not taken very(prenominal) seriously. Subsequently, in Canadian sketch comedy it is nigh the opposite, rarely is in that location a violent forthbreak, instead violence is merely talked or so not acted out. However, the comedy programs that get high ratings are the American programs, not Canadian. This shows that violence portrayed in programs rattling increase ratings, and unfortunately many viewers pose it to their delight. Although depictions of violence may get high ratings it effects bulk of each ages, and is especi bothy detrimental to children. The behavioural outcomes remain the same for both America and Canada; however, the numbers of affected multitude are great in the U.S. Some of the affects of violence portrayed in television are visualizeing to yield violently, desensitization to violence, and stately of being attacked (media-awareness.ca). In a subject violence ascertain that was conducted in America it was found that 73% of perpetrators go undisciplined in violent scenes, which makes viewers more likely to learn that violence is prospering (media-awareness.ca) This negative effect of viewing violence especially affects children. Children who systematically view violence are more likely to be assimilate the same way. An another(prenominal) important event found from the National Television Violence Study was 25% of violent interaction on T.V involves side arms (media-awareness.ca). This could be the source that the joined States has the highest homicide rate among school-aged children, nearly 5,300 died as a result of objet darts in 1995 (asbj.com). In 1996 it was found that hand submarine sandwichs were used to murder 106 people in Canada and 9,266 in America. This staggerin! g difference is possibly the result of the futile munition regulations that the U.S has. The reason that hand petrols are out of keep in the U.S could be due to the second amendment in the broadsheet of Rights recognizing the remedy to keep and bear arms. This could very well be the reason why the U.S has the weakest gun regulations, and the highest gun violence than all other countries. The only law Americans fix regarding gun assure is the Brady law. This law was implemented in 1993 and requires a desktop incumbrance be done, and a quintuple twenty-four hours time lag catch before you get to keep the gun. However, in 1998 the five day background defend was replaced by a required, computerized national check strategy. This system only takes a a few(prenominal) legal proceeding to do a background check on small-arm purchases. Consequently, the performance to buy a gun only takes a few minutes. This fast and easy way to buy a gun explains the high rate of violenc e in America. In Canada, the come up of deaths due to handguns is low in comparison to the U.S. The laws pertaining to firearms are very different in Canada. In 1995, anchor Minister dungaree Chretian demanded and got the Firearms Act, a national system of firearm registration and licensing. Since celestial latitude 1, 1998 the Canadian Firearms Act of 1995 went into intact effect, and Canadians are now subscribe toful to register their firearms no later then January 2003. The Firearms Act requires that in order to purchase a gun a possession and acquisition license is mandatory (usgovinfo.abou.com). In Canada the possession of handguns is curtail to collectors, target shooters and those who demonstrate the need of guns to protect their live. The U.S has not such restriction. Another very different component Canada is the Firearms Act requires a safety course be taken. In order to feature or buy a rifle, shotgun or handgun the safety course mustiness be accomplish ed. The limitations and laws regarding gun control in! Canada are very distinctive compared to the U.S. The high intensity level of gun violence in the states correlates to its weak gun regulations. This in turn reflects the come in of violence that is portrayed on American programs. It would be crackbrained not to include what American and Canadian governments are projection as a result of violence on television. The U.S and Canada have both recognized the ill affects of violence on television. Similarly, both countries have mandated the innovative V-Chip technology. The V-chip allows parents to monitor what children are watching by controlling the television programs they view. An American choose that was conducted by Kaiser Family fanny in 1999 found that 77% of parents would use the V-Chip if they had one (usinfo.state.gov). The effectuation of the V-chip would be effective since more than half of the parents in the U.S would use it. Parents are obviously concerned about what their children are undefended to, and this i s an effective way of filtering violent programs. Canada and U.S have similar rating systems, they determine what types of programs are suitable for children, and what are not. This is helpful since many American programs are shown in Canada. both(prenominal) countries hope to have the bare-ass V-Chip technology installed in all new television sets. The effect of violence on television cannot be ignored and is an issue that the U.S and Canada have to deal with. The amount of violence that is portrayed on American shows is off the beaten track(predicate) greater than on Canadian shows, til now many of the American programs are viewed by Canadians. Therefore both countries have to deal with the unspeakable affects that it has especially on children. The psychological affects can lead to violent outbreaks, especially with handguns. American gun violence is extremely high, principally because of its exceptionally weak gun regulations. On the contrary Canada has late applied the strict Canadian Firearms Act to regulate gun control! . The Canadian law pertaining to guns seems to be more effective since the amount of gun violence is far less. This issue cannot be dealt with lightly, and in turn both countries have implemented a system in hope of filtering out violent programs. The portrayal of violence is highly unlikely to ever be eliminated; however, it can be now be monitored with the V-Chip. It exit be a go on struggle to change magnitude violence in both countries scarcely at least(prenominal) the governments have started to deal with the issue. Work Cited 1.         Retrieved from the military personnel widely weathervane declination 2, 2001. http://www.fraserinstitute.ca/publications/onbalance/1998/february/news.html 2.         Retrieved from the man Wide blade December 2, 2001. www.media-awareness.ca/eng/med/home/resources/ntvs.htm 3.         Retrieved from the World Wide Web December 2, 2001. www.asbj.com/ security department/contents/0399hayne schalker.html 4.         Retrieved from the World Wide Web December 2, 2001 www.usgov.info.about.com 5.         Retrieved from the World Wide Web December 2, 2001 www.usinfo.state.gov/the States/schools/vchip.htm If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper