Landmark Supreme Court Decisions Essay -- essays research papers

Landmark despotic motor hotel Decisions just abtaboo 32 years ago, in celestial latitude of 1965, a group of adults and studentsfrom stilbesterol Moines, Iowa gathered to show their dislike to state of wards Americaninvolvement in the Vietnam War. They refractory to part blacken armbands and fast onDecember 16 and 31 to exhibit there point. When the principals of the DesMoines train System found out their plans, they refractory to suspend any matchless whotook part in this type of protest. On December 16 - 17 three Tinker siblingsand several of their friends were suspended for draining the armbands. altogether(a) ofthem did non return to school until after New eld Day. playing with theirparents, the Tinkers and rough separate students went to the Federal District motor hotel,request for an order to be issued by Iowa. This court refused the idea,forcing them to take the case to the coercive Court. later hearing their case,the Supreme Court concord with the Tinke rs. They said that exhausting blackarmbands was a silent form of human face and that students do not give way to giveup their world-class Amendment rights at school. This landmark Supreme Court case wasknown as Tinker v. Des Moines fencesitter School District.From the case of Tinker v. Des Moines Ind. School Board manifestly camesome conflicting viewpoints about the armbands. The school board said that noone has the absolute right to exemption of expression, where the Tinkers said thatonly censor armbands and not other political symbols was unconstitutional. Theschool board said that the armbands were debauched to the discipline environment,where the Tinkers said they were not. Finally, the school board said that orderin the classroom, where political contestation should be discussed, is entitledto constitutional protection. The Tinkers believed that the armbands were wornas the students views, and because should be constitutionally protected andrespected by the school. T hese were all grand arguments in the case.Personally, I agree with the Supreme Courts decision to promote the 1stAmendment rights of the students in school. Why shouldnt students have thesame rights as other heap? If the students wore obscene clothing, ran out ofclassrooms, or set the school on get up in protest of the war, then yes, I couldsee disciplinal actio... ...chool districts.In contrast, the time periods in which these cases took place were very opposite. In the 1960s, the war in Vietnam was going on, and there were a lotof controversial issues and viewpoints face students at schools. In the1980s, the war was over and there werent as legion(predicate) controversial issuessurrounding students rights. One case involved freedom of expression through aschool newspaper, the other through articles of clothing, but the major unlikeness between the two cases were the decisions made by the U.S. SupremeCourt. They agreed with the Tinkers in the belief that freedom of express ionthrough armbands was okay. However, they disagreed with Cathy Kuhlmeiersbelief in freedom of expression through a so-called public forum.As a student, I believe that freedom of expression is one of our nearly essential rights. Without this right people wont know who we are they wontunderstand our generation. Because of the many another(prenominal) different definitions of freedomof expression, people will always be in controversy over them. Lets hope thatour school district never faces a occupation as big as the ones presented in thispaper. Landmark Supreme Court Decisions Essay -- essays research papers Landmark Supreme Court DecisionsAbout 32 years ago, in December of 1965, a group of adults and studentsfrom Des Moines, Iowa gathered to show their dislike towards Americaninvolvement in the Vietnam War. They decided to wear black armbands and fast onDecember 16 and 31 to express there point. When the principals of the DesMoines School System found out their pl ans, they decided to suspend anyone whotook part in this type of protest. On December 16 - 17 three Tinker siblingsand several of their friends were suspended for wearing the armbands. All ofthem did not return to school until after New Years Day. Acting through theirparents, the Tinkers and some other students went to the Federal District Court,asking for an injunction to be issued by Iowa. This court refused the idea,forcing them to take the case to the Supreme Court. After hearing their case,the Supreme Court agreed with the Tinkers. They said that wearing blackarmbands was a silent form of expression and that students do not have to giveup their 1st Amendment rights at school. This landmark Supreme Court case wasknown as Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District.From the case of Tinker v. Des Moines Ind. School Board obviously camesome conflicting viewpoints about the armbands. The school board said that noone has the absolute right to freedom of expression, where the Tin kers said thatonly banning armbands and not other political symbols was unconstitutional. Theschool board said that the armbands were disruptive to the learning environment,where the Tinkers said they were not. Finally, the school board said that orderin the classroom, where political controversy should be discussed, is entitledto constitutional protection. The Tinkers believed that the armbands were wornas the students views, and therefore should be constitutionally protected andrespected by the school. These were all important arguments in the case.Personally, I agree with the Supreme Courts decision to uphold the 1stAmendment rights of the students in school. Why shouldnt students have thesame rights as other people? If the students wore obscene clothing, ran out ofclassrooms, or set the school on fire in protest of the war, then yes, I couldsee disciplinary actio... ...chool districts.In contrast, the time periods in which these cases took place were verydifferent. In the 1960s , the war in Vietnam was going on, and there were a lotof controversial issues and viewpoints facing students at schools. In the1980s, the war was over and there werent as many controversial issuessurrounding students rights. One case involved freedom of expression through aschool newspaper, the other through articles of clothing, but the majordifference between the two cases were the decisions made by the U.S. SupremeCourt. They agreed with the Tinkers in the belief that freedom of expressionthrough armbands was okay. However, they disagreed with Cathy Kuhlmeiersbelief in freedom of expression through a so-called public forum.As a student, I believe that freedom of expression is one of our mostimportant rights. Without this right people wont know who we are they wontunderstand our generation. Because of the many different definitions of freedomof expression, people will always be in controversy over them. Lets hope thatour school district never faces a problem as big as the ones pr esented in thispaper.